Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Problem-plagued New Jersey Senate campaign mars Booker's political ascent


CLIFFSIDE PARK, N.J. — Cory Booker’s bid for New Jersey’s U.S. Senate seat had been considered an easy steppingstone to the national political stage, another ambitious step in what has been his stratospheric rise into the upper echelon of the Democratic Party.


But a race that was supposed to be a cakewalk for the 44-year-old Newark mayor has been anything but — hijacked by strange tales including Booker’s Twitter messaging with a vegan stripper and his possible invention of a drug dealer friend named T-Bone often cited in his stump speech. Also damaging were stories about how he’d personally profited off being one of the most famous mayors in America — including more than $1 million in speaking fees that he had not previously disclosed.


Republican opponent Steve Lonegan has seized on Booker's missteps to portray him as a political opportunist who is more concerned with his own ambition than in New Jersey residents. He argues that Newark has not improved under Booker's tenure — pointing to, among other things, an uptick in crime in recent months.


"Under Cory Booker, about a month ago, 14-year-old Ali Henderson was shot to death in the streets of Newark while he was on the Jimmy Fallon show telling people what a great job he was doing," Lonegan declared in the race's final debate on Wednesday night.


Booker is in no serious danger of losing his bid for Senate — polls show him with at least a 10-point lead over Lonegan in the closing days before the Oct. 16 special election to replace Democratic Sen Frank Lautenberg, who died in June. But Booker's problematic campaign has left a blemish on Booker’s once enviable reputation as a rising star with the oratorical chops of President Barack Obama and digital savvy unmatched by any elected official of his generation.

The race has raised also questions about whether Booker is merely guilty of rookie mistakes in his first national campaign or if he’s simply not the promising newcomer national Democrats once believed him to be.


Booker’s missteps have prompted concern among allies who thought the race was a sure thing. Earlier this week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg launched a $1 million ad campaign to help shore up the Democratic hopeful in the final days before the election.


While Booker's aides insist concern about his campaign is overblown, the candidate has made a major course correction in recent days. After weeks of maintaining a light campaign schedule and largely ignoring Lonegan, Booker has stepped up his appearances and gone on the attack against Lonegan, launching a television ad attacking his opponent as a tea party extremist.


It’s a message that Booker has echoed on the stump in recent days, though the Newark mayor has been noticeably off his game.

On Tuesday, Booker held an event outside a Head Start facility in Cliffside Park — just across the Hudson River from New York City — where he attacked Lonegan for supporting the government shutdown. But that particular Head Start facility had not yet been affected by the shutdown, and just before he spoke, parents continued to arrive at the facility with their kids.


Booker also seemed to stumble at times over attack lines against Lonegan, and noticeably lacked the energy and charisma of past speeches that have often electrified the party faithful. He also seemed unprepared for questions about what he would do to end the shutdown if he were in Washington — delivering a rambling response that included vague promises of working with Republicans as he has with Gov. Chris Christie in New Jersey.


“But what exactly would you do?” a reporter pressed.


“I am not going to negotiate with myself right now for this purposes of this press conference … but I will be going down there to partner with people to find a way to end the shutdown,” Booker replied.


“But who would you work with?” another reporter asked.


Booker seemed exasperated. “I don’t say there’s an inability to work with anybody down there,” he replied.


While Booker remains the hands-down favorite in the race, the fact that he’s not leading by a bigger margin has mystified many Democrats — many of whom declined to be interviewed on the record about Booker or his campaign.


They criticized Booker for not campaigning more vigorously after winning the Democratic nomination in mid-August and for allowing Lonegan's attacks to go unanswered for weeks. Perhaps most of all, they were irritated that Booker had even allowed Lonegan to become a factor in the race — something that has puzzled political observers as well.


“Booker had the chance to blow this open early by drawing distinctions between himself and Steve Lonegan. New Jersey voters tend to turn away from Republicans who are too far to the right on social issues,” said Patrick Murray, a political scientist at Monmouth University. “The problem is, Cory Booker didn't even mention his opponent until just over a week ago. That allowed Lonegan to attack Booker's record and the veracity of his personal story without it being defended. It didn't help that Booker was making unforced errors at the same time.”


A former mayor of Bogota, N.J., Lonegan is a self-described tea party “radical” who has taken strongly conservative views at odds with New Jersey’s heavily Democratic voting electorate. Among other things, he has campaigned in favor of the federal shutdown and opposes legal abortion, even in the case of rape or incest. Lonegan recently campaigned with Texas Gov. Rick Perry, and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin will appear with Lonegan in New Jersey on Saturday.


But Lonegan has continued to move up in the polls, despite the overall weakness of his candidacy and with virtually no help from national Republicans, who have ignored the New Jersey race.


At a campaign stop on Tuesday, Lonegan spent nearly 15 minutes going through the meticulous history of tax policy in New Jersey, dating back to the state’s role in the 13 original U.S. colonies. He also claimed momentum in the race and predicted a victory that would “shock Democrats in Washington.”

Lonegan has accused Booker of “underestimating” his candidacy — a charge that Booker literally laughed off when asked for a response.


“That’s not the case,” Booker told Yahoo News. “In politics in New Jersey, you take every election seriously. You are talking to a guy who has come through some pretty tough races over my years.”


But Booker has given Lonegan an opening several times in the race. First, in an interview with the Washington Post, he encouraged speculation about his sexuality — telling the paper that he enjoyed it when people question whether he is gay.

A few days later, a historian told National Review Booker had confessed to him that a story he frequently told on the stump about meeting a drug dealer named T-Bone was made up — forcing the candidate back on the defensive.


In the most salacious campaign development, BuzzFeed reported that Booker had been exchanging flirty private Twitter messages with a Portland, Ore., vegan stripper named Lynsie Lee.


Booker spokesman Kevin Griffis defended his boss, insisting Booker has communicated with “people from all walks of life on Twitter.” Indeed, Booker’s political rise has stemmed from his unabashed embrace of social media — he has about 1.4 million Twitter followers and has been known to respond directly to many who send him messages.


He has personally responded to pothole complaints and made diaper runs for constituents stranded by a blizzard. During Superstorm Sandy last year, Booker took in a group of displaced Newark residents he met online, allowing them to bunk at his condo and watch his sci-fi movie collection.


But Lonegan has accused Booker of being more flash than substance — pointing to a dramatic increase in crime in Newark in recent months and suggesting the long troubled city has not improved under Booker’s leadership. He's also attacked Booker for his frequent travel out of state and for hanging out with celebrities like Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, who recently hosted a fundraiser for Booker’s campaign in Los Angeles.


"What New Jersey needs, sir, is a leader, not a tweeter," Lonegan told Booker during a recent debate. "We need somebody who's going to be there to govern, who's going to be there to do the job — not be running around the country on speaking tours and getting speaking fees."


But Booker insisted his travels around the country have included efforts to get private support for Newark — including a highly publicized $100 million donation from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to improve Newark public schools.


Lonegan’s attacks have taken a toll on Booker. A recent Monmouth University poll found a plurality of voters — 45 percent — believe he is in the race to raise his national profile, compared with 35 percent who say he is running to improve New Jersey.


And while 54 percent of likely New Jersey voters view Booker favorably, that number is down 7 points from June when he and Christie were among the most popular politicians in the state, thanks to strong support from independent swing voters.


Christie has been able to transform his own popularity into a major lead in his race for re-election. A Quinnipiac University poll found Christie leading his Democratic challenger, Barbara Buono, 62 percent to 33 percent —  thanks largely to his popularity among independents.


By comparison, Booker has lost ground with independent voters, who now favor Lonegan in the race 50 percent to 44 percent according to Quinnipiac. Two weeks ago, the voting bloc was split between Booker (47 percent) and Lonegan (44 percent).


Booker’s quest in the final days of the campaign isn’t just about winning the race. He is aiming to win by a significant margin in hopes that it might undo some of the damage to his reputation not just as an elected official but as a skilled campaigner.


Further complicating matters, his campaign announced Thursday Booker would suspend his campaign schedule for the day. Cary Booker, his 76-year-old father who recently suffered a stroke, had passed away in Las Vegas.



Source: http://news.yahoo.com/cory-booker-new-jersey-senate-110059550.html
Similar Articles: TSLA   washington post   cher   American flag   msft  

Michelle Obama Requests 'Mademoiselle C' for Private White House Screening


Carine Roitfeld, star of Fabien Constant's documentary Mademoiselle C, has found a fan in Michelle Obama.



According to Fashionista, the director confirmed to the fashion news website that the first lady requested a copy of Mademoiselle C -- which documents Roitfeld's life as she launches her own magazine, CR Fashion Book -- for a private screening at the White House.


PHOTOS: NYFW: Fashionistas Fete Carine Roitfeld at 'Mademoiselle C' Premiere


During New York Fashion Week in September, the world premiere of Mademoiselle C (co-sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter) saw actresses Sarah Jessica Parker, Rose Byrne and Kelly Rutherford; supermodels Miranda Kerr, Alessandra Ambrosio, Karolina Kurkova and Lily Donaldson; and Hollywood stylist George Kotsiopoulos also showing their support for the chic 58-year-old French fashion icon.


"I learned about Carine that she is mixing everything -- work and personal life -- but I didn't expect it to be that much," said Constant at the star-studded premiere in New York. "So the lady you see here is the one you see on the screen, and the one you see in the CR Fashion Book is the one you can see in everything she does. It's like a therapy when you go to see the film. I'm really happy with the work of the team. I think of magazines, of everything, shooting is about a team."


The first lady was scheduled to make an appearance Oct. 11 in Los Angeles but canceled her trip as a result of the federal government's ongoing shutdown.


Mademoiselle C opened Sept. 11 in New York, followed by a Sept. 20 release in L.A.


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thr/film/~3/rGU-mZAsbD4/story01.htm
Tags: Gta V Cheats   Wentworth Miller   Blackboard   Riley Cooper   ryan braun  

Monday, October 14, 2013

Operation: Blame the Liberals

Former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin, center, and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), center left, hold their hands over their hearts during the national anthem as veterans, their families and supporters hold a rally at the WWII Memorial to protest its' closing on October, 13, 2013 in Washington, DC.
Sarah Palin, center, and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), center left, during a rally at the WWII Memorial this past weekend in Washington, D.C.

Photo by Bill O'Leary/Washington Post








Saturday morning at the Capitol started with a bout of déjà vu: House Republicans gathering in a basement, learning that their latest shutdown demands would not be met. Around 10 a.m., when the meeting ended, Republicans had little good to say about the latest offers from the president and the Senate. Most of them avoided the cameras and returned to their offices. A handful of members spun out of the room and headed to the park on the west of the Capitol, just a couple hundred feet away.










They found sanctuary inside a small, triangle-shaped clearing blocked off by portable fences. Tea Party Patriots and FreedomWorks, two of the movement’s oldest organizing forces, had asked activists to help “fix up D.C.” by filling in for the furloughed custodians of the national mall. Glenn Beck, who’s been paid at least $1 million to work with FreedomWorks, had flown in to lead the clean-up. Utah Sen. Mike Lee, one of the capos of the “defund Obamacare” campaign, was his co-star. A hundred or so people gathered around the fences, snapping photos and listening to members of Congress update Lee and Beck.










Washington was occupied all weekend by conservatives who insisted that the shutdown was an act of malice by President Obama.










“We were told in conference that the president wants to use the Senate to break Republicans,” Rep. Michele Bachmann told Lee. Lee explained that some silly Republicans were already willing to try to cut a deal with Obama—“trust us this time.” Beck sketched out his speech and smiled for photos with Matt Kibbe, the president of FreedomWorks, who’d come wearing jeans and a green trucker’s hat that read, “VOLUNTEER.” None of them got any privacy to strategize until FreedomWorks’ outreach director Deneen Borelli stepped up to a microphone to address the crowd, the noise drowning out everything else.












“Today brings back great memories for me,” she said, “because four years ago FreedomWorks had the amazing march on D.C.—9/12. And that event drew over 800,000 freedom-loving Americans. Because of that rally I was launched as a national figure to stand for liberty.”










Anyone not at this rally would have been confused. Was Borelli, the author of Blacklash: How Obama and the Left Are Driving Americans to the Government Plantation, a “national figure?” Was it the best idea to invoke the heyday of the Tea Party, when scores more people could have flooded the space around the Capitol? Two weeks into the shutdown, Sen. Ted Cruz’s “grassroots tsunami” to defund Obamacare hasn’t materialized. Polling suggests that the Republican position is waning from week to week.














The activists simply don’t believe it. Washington was occupied all weekend by conservatives who insisted that the shutdown was an act of malice by President Obama, exemplified by the closure of national monuments. “Truckers for the Constitution,” a group of conspiracy theorists who occasionally appear on Fox News, won a mind-blowing amount of media attention for an attempt to “shut down the Beltway” with their several-dozen trucks. The Values Voter Summit, an annual meeting of social conservatives, made light of the shutdown by putting barricades on its stage—a reminder of the haphazardly enforced gates in front of monuments on the National Mall. The Washington Examiner, a magazine that recently reduced its local reporting staff to focus on politics, told readers that an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll showing the GOP badly losing was skewed toward government workers. That made it “all but useless as support for strategic decisions by anybody involved in the shutdown debate,” but “perfectly consistent with the conventional wisdom of the traditional media.”










“I haven’t seen much public reaction except people criticizing the administration,” said Regis Campbell, a Maryland activist who’d bought two rakes to the clean-up rally. “Sure, the polls do say people blame Republicans, but I don’t know—I think when push comes to shove, people will realize where the blame really lies. All [Obama] has to do is come down with an executive order to stop the mandate, OK? Then we could give him a clean CR.”










“It’s fascinating,” said Pat Jakowski, a Maryland physical therapist who brought a garbage-picking wand to the Saturday rally. “If you really look at the demographics of the polls, you can see how easily they skew them. It’s another misleading source of information. The intelligent people who really pay attention to information can’t count on that.”










Beck’s speech tested the theory. The former Fox News host, who now runs a subscription-based online news channel, regaled the crowd with the story of anti-slavery Massachusetts Sen. Charles Sumner. “He was, I think, the Ted Cruz or Mike Lee or Rand Paul of his day,” said Beck. “The most hated Whig! He was the guy who was kind of really leading the Whig Party. There were only 20 of them, but they were tired of the lies. They knew the Whig Party was playing around with slavery, but it was time for slavery to end.”










Sumner, according to Beck, was hated because he proved how phony the rest of his party was when it pretended to oppose a law, and that his Whigs needed to be replaced by a new, honest party. “When Charles Sumner was on the floor of the Senate, a guy came from the House of Representatives came in with a big cane and beat him almost to death. Almost killed him! Nobody helped him—the only reason he survived was that he was able to drag himself underneath his desk. It took him two years to heal. They never prosecuted the guy with the cane, because he was popular. He was in a special, protected class!”










Beck got the caning right, but basically nothing else. By 1856, when Sumner was caned, the senator was already aligned with the new Republicans. Rep. Preston Brooks—the congressman who delivered the caning—was a Southern Democrat, not an angry Whig punishing Sumner for making the party look bad. He resigned after a failed vote to expel him from Congress, and he was fined $300—not the punishment he deserved, obviously, but a fluke of his support from the South, not a protection racket by the elites.


















Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/10/glenn_beck_sarah_palin_and_tea_party_republicans_clean_up_the_mall_conservative.html
Related Topics: cnn news   krispy kreme   school shooting   elvis presley   cote de pablo  

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Walking Can Reduce Breast Cancer Risk | Psych Central News

By
Rick Nauert PhD
Senior News Editor


Reviewed by John M. Grohol, Psy.D.
on October 7, 2013



Walking Can Reduce Breast Cancer RiskResearchers learn that lowering the risk of breast cancer may be as simple as going for a walk.


Investigators discovered postmenopausal women who were very active or walked for at least seven hours a week had a reduced risk for breast cancer.


The study is published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.


Upon the study of 73,615 postmenopausal women, researchers discovered women who engaged in at least an hour of vigorous physical activity every day had a 25 percent lower risk for breast cancer.


Moreover, those who walked for at least seven hours a week had a 14 percent lower risk for breast cancer.


“We examined whether recreational physical activity, specifically walking, was associated with lower breast cancer risk. Given that more than 60 percent of women report some daily walking, promoting walking as a healthy leisure-time activity could be an effective strategy for increasing physical activity among postmenopausal women,” said Alpa Patel, Ph.D.


“We were pleased to find that without any other recreational activity, just walking an average of one hour per day was associated with lower risk of breast cancer in these women.”


After making adjustments to the data, the researchers determined that the observed benefits of physical activity and walking were not influenced by body type (BMI and weight gain) or hormonal status (postmenopausal hormone use and estrogen receptor status).


This is the first study to report a lower risk for breast cancer among this demographic associated specifically with walking, according to the authors.


“Current guidelines recommend that adults should strive to get at least 2.5 hours per week of moderate-intensity activity, or 75 minutes per week of vigorous-intensity aerobic activity for overall health. Higher levels of activity may provide greater benefit for breast cancer prevention,” said Patel.


Patel and colleagues identified 73,615 postmenopausal women from a large cohort of 97,785 women aged 50 to 74 years, recruited between 1992 and 1993.


Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on demographic, medical, and environmental factors during enrollment.


They also completed follow-up questionnaires every two years between 1997 and 2009, to update information on new exposures and newly diagnosed cancers.


All participants provided information on the average number of hours they spent on various physical activities including walking, jogging, swimming, playing tennis, bicycling, and performing aerobic exercises every week, and the number of hours spent in leisure time sitting, including watching television and reading.


The researchers calculated the total hours of metabolic equivalent (MET) per week for each participant, which is a ratio of the energy spent during a specific activity to the resting metabolic rate.


Among the study participants, 4,760 of them subsequently developed breast cancer.


The researchers found that about 9.2 percent of the participants did not partake in any physical activity, and about 47 percent of them reported walking as their only activity.


The median MET expenditure among active women was 9.5 MET hours per week, which translates to 3.5 hours of moderately-paced walking.


They found that the most active women with 42 MET hours per week or more (at least one hour of vigorous activity every day) had a 25 percent lower risk for breast cancer compared with women who were least active, with less than seven MET hours per week (e.g., moderately-paced walking for two hours a week).


Among women who reported walking as their only activity, those who walked for seven hours or more per week had a 14 percent lower risk for breast cancer, compared with those who walked for three hours or less.


They did not find any risk associated with time spent sitting.


Source: American Association for Cancer Research


Elderly woman with walking sticks photo by shutterstock.


































APA Reference

Nauert, R. (2013). Walking Can Reduce Breast Cancer Risk. Psych Central.
Retrieved on October 12, 2013, from http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/10/07/walking-can-reduce-breast-cancer-risk/60437.html



 







Source: http://psychcentral.com/news/2013/10/07/walking-can-reduce-breast-cancer-risk/60437.html
Tags: government shutdown   Humble Bundle   beyonce   catherine zeta jones   Lincoln Memorial  

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Fears for science amid US shutdown















American scientists are scrambling to preserve vital research programmes amid the US government funding shutdown.


Key projects investigating ice loss in Antarctica are among those at risk as plans for fieldwork are stalled.


If the expeditions do not go ahead, it could jeopardise investigations that have gathered data over decades.


Medical research, including studies of degenerative disease, is also held up as government-employed scientists have been sent home.


The case of the National Science Foundation is typical of many US funding bodies - it has closed its front door and no-one is answering calls or emails. Websites of the likes of Nasa are redirecting to holding pages.


The chief concern among scientists is that long-running projects monitoring change could now be harmed by a sudden break in the flow of data.


One major initiative known as IceBridge - which uses aircraft to study the edges of the ice-sheet in West Antarctica, and is regarded as crucial for understanding future sea-level rise - has been delayed by two weeks already.


Unofficial communication

The planes are fitted with laser and radar systems to measure the height of the ice sheet as it approaches the coast - and gathering annual data is essential for researchers trying to understand patterns of change.


The plan for the approaching field season in Antarctica was to operate the plane from landing strips on the ice but this will become impossible later next month as temperatures rise with the Southern Hemisphere summer, potentially putting at risk the entire season's fieldwork.


Teams involved in the project are known to be working on contingency plans in the hope that a budget deal can be struck soon by US President Barack Obama and the House of Representatives.


With official lines of communication between funding agencies and scientists currently suspended, many have resorted to private corridors to maintain some level of organisation. Information is being passed through Gmail and Hotmail accounts, and through social media such as Facebook and Twitter.


The message put out to Antarctic researchers on Wednesday was that the upcoming season was not all lost. Many groups are not due to go out until December, and so there is still the chance that some projects can be rescued.


"But there is this overwhelming sense of confusion and frustration, and the inability to get clear information on what is going on because the NSF has closed along with the other government agencies," one university glaciologist told the BBC.


"We've been told to keep planning for the Antarctic season, but it's like being at school and all the teachers have gone home; you don't know where to go for guidance because they're not there."


Data poor

With many major research projects now run internationally, the effect of the US shutdown will also be felt by scientists beyond the United States.


Several British polar scientists are thought to be scheduled to join American expeditions but face being delayed or even losing out completely.


For the moment, the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) is insisting that the impact on UK polar science will be minimal.


But Prof Jane Francis, director of BAS, warned in a statement that, "the potential loss of data which would be collected by American scientists, and shared with other research teams, would have an impact on the science we conduct.


"At present, BAS is working on the assumption the US financial situation will be resolved soon, and any joint work can go ahead as planned. We are monitoring the situation on a daily basis."


One American project known as RICE, investigating a margin of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, is due to involve scientists from China, New Zealand, Denmark and one researcher from the UK. At the moment, its fate is uncertain.


Other fields of research are vulnerable, too - and British scientists are among those raising concerns.


International focus

Prof John Hardy, of University College London, said: "Vital work on Alzheimer's and Parkinson's is being held up while hardworking scientists are being forced to stay at home, without even being allowed to read their email. It is difficult to see how this is fiscally responsible."


Imran Khan, chief executive of the British Science Association, said: "The biggest lesson we should take from this week's Nobel Prizes is that science doesn't belong to one nation; it's an international and collaborative human enterprise.


"Our scientists work with American scientists, and the UK public benefits enormously from research that goes on there, as well as vice versa.


"If the shutdown continues, it's bad news for both scientists and the public here in the UK as well as across the pond."


American satellites are still functioning and data is being gathered, but Nasa scientists are among those refused funding to travel to international conferences - a key part of the process of scientific exchange.


One leading space agency scientist, speaking from home, told me that the shutdown was "deeply frustrating and very bad for morale - it's illegal for us to work".


Instead of managing a research project, he's keeping himself busy in his garden. "The koi pond has never looked better," he said.





Category: julio jones   today show   elizabeth smart   calvin johnson   detroit tigers  

Monday, August 12, 2013

FDA and e-cigarettes: Nicotine addiction must not be the norm

Since 2010, the Food and Drug Administration has been debating how to regulate the sale of e-cigarettes. The FDA should hurry up. These battery-powered devices, which heat a nicotine solution and create an inhalable vapor, are exploding in popularity ? driven mostly by a tobacco industry in search of new addicts.

Addiction itself does lie at the heart of the FDA?s dilemma about regulating e-cigarettes. Should the agency assume that millions of Americans choose to be nicotine addicts, with the federal role simply to make the use of electronic cigarettes as safe as possible? Or should the FDA see this powerful addiction as inherently wrong, both for individuals and society, with the government helping people avoid or overcome it?

Several countries already ban the sale of e-cigarettes, a wise course for the FDA. They see the electronic devices as delivering a drug with no use, even if it does not have all the effects of regular smoking. Indeed, the tobacco industry does not claim e-cigarettes are a temporary tool for ending tobacco addiction. Most likely, e-cigarettes are being heavily promoted to attract people to take up smoking. Yearly sales of e-cigarettes are already approaching $1 billion.

Any benefit of e-cigarettes remains unproven while a few toxins have been found in the device?s vapors. At least three American cities ban their use indoors. And, according to one study, quitting e-cigarettes may be as difficult as for tobacco smoking.

In taking any action, the FDA must assume people do not want to become addicts to nicotine. Government already takes that approach inherently with increasing restrictions on the sale and use of tobacco products. The result has been a welcome decline in public smoking and smoking in general. People tempted to take up smoking now face difficult choices ? in costs, inconvenience, and social stigma.

The opposite approach of tolerance toward e-cigarettes would be similar to the way states, once faced with criminal activities associated with illegal gambling, decided that people everywhere want to gamble and government might as well join in by offering lotteries. Now millions of mainly poor people can?t get enough of this daily gambling fix. And states are addicted to the revenues.

Simply curbing the sale of e-cigarettes to minors should not be the FDA?s final decision. The agency, and indeed much of government, can help persuade people that nicotine addiction is not ?cool? and can be easily avoidable. The agency should do more than prevent harm. It can also assert that each individual has a right to be free of addiction.

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/fda-e-cigarettes-nicotine-addiction-must-not-norm-120438785.html

facebook organ donor jessica simpson gives birth

Thursday, August 8, 2013

How to Network at an Event - Smart Business Revolution

how-to-network-at-an-eventNetworking at in-person events like conferences and cocktail parties is one of the most challenging of all types of networking.

If you are shy or introverted, then going out and networking at in-person events may be even more difficult for you.

You may even hate face-to-face networking events. OK, that?s fine. Unfortunately though, even if you hate in-person networking, that doesn?t mean you get a free pass.

I?d love to tell you in today?s social media-fixated culture, you can simply give up on in-person networking events, but that would be a lie. In fact, old fashioned, face-to-face networking is one of the best activities you can engage in for your career or your business, hands down.

But there is good news. The best way to overcome the many challenges of face-to-face networking is to have a plan for how to network in advance.

Without a plan, you will likely waste a lot of time, or the experience will be not much fun. The good news is it?s very easy to develop a plan for how to network at an event that you can use repeatedly.

Here are 8 tips for how to network at an event:

1. Have a positive attitude

The first, and most important, step is to have a positive attitude going into any networking session, happy hour, cocktail party or conference. If you aren?t thrilled about coming to the event, then you might as well not go, because showing up without a positive attitude will send a message to everyone else that you are not interested in them.

2. Dress Appropriately for the Occasion

My friend Antonio Centeno has written a wonderful overview of how to dress appropriately for a networking event over at the Art of Manliness. In fact, the first time I met Antonio was at a conference, and he stood out to me as someone I wanted to meet because of how well-dressed he was.

Wearing the right attire to a networking event cannot be understated, as people will be making snap judgments about you. So you should aim to dress 10% better than everyone else in the room.

You should also be sensitive to the industry you are in so that your attire is appropriate. People dress more casually in the entertainment and advertising industries and more formally in the financial services industry.

3. Bring Business Cards

I don?t understand people who show up to a networking event without business cards. You should have a well-designed card, even if you don?t have a job, with your phone number and contact information.? It?s easy to order an inexpensive but good-looking stack of business cards any of a number of online services, such as Vistaprint.

You should have a goal of getting rid of as many of these cards as possible. Pretend your business cards are on fire if you have to. If you have trouble asking people for their business card in return, then the best thing you can do is to practice, practice, practice. It will get easier.

I also recommend putting your business cards somewhere easily accessible before walking in to the event, so that you don?t have to dig around your wallet or purse in order to fish out a card. If the cards are more easily accessible, you are more likely to exchange cards with someone.

I also recommend keeping a scrap of paper or small notebook with you so that you can jot down someone?s contact information if they do, heaven forbid, fail to bring business cards. Do not rely on them to email you as I?ve found most people who forget to bring a business card will also forget to email you a follow up with their contact information (even if they promise they will email you ? they won?t).

4. Do Research in Advance

One great tip is to research the people who you may meet at the event well before you arrive. Find out if the event you are going to publishes a list of attendees in advance. If there is an advance list, you can identify people who are coming who you want to speak with at the event. Services like Evite.com and eventbrite.com often publish attendee lists.

In her book Reinventing You: Define Your Brand, Imagine Your Future (affiliate link), author Dorie Clark profiles one successful executive who ?stalked the biographies? of people he admired. These days, websites like LinkedIn makes it very easy to research peoples? career histories. Given how accessible information is online these days, I think you are more likely to commit a faux pas by not knowing details about someone?s background than you are to commit a foul by knowing details about them.

In fact, not doing research in advance can even be embarrassing. I went to a small dinner in San Francisco recently where I ended up sitting next to the wife of a famous author of a book about entrepreneurship. This book had been on my ?must read? list for months. The dinner conversation inevitably turned to the husband?s book and I could only sit there, helpless, like I was stuck on mute. I had nothing to contribute. (I also didn?t want to admit I hadn?t read the book yet.)

If I had done research in advance, I might have known this woman would be there and been more prepared by having read the book.

5. Arrive on Time

Arriving on time sends a message that you are disciplined, organized and respectful. In addition, I find that arriving to a partially empty room is easier than arriving to a full room. When you arrive to a room early, you are forced to meet the few other early arrivers.

When you arrive late, then the whole room may be full and it can be more awkward to walk up to someone at random and introduce yourself.

6. Avoid the Hors D?Oeuvres Table

Few things are less attractive than a person talking with a mouth full of food. If you must eat, keep it clean and neat and do not open your mouth while eating. Try to eat quickly.

If you can avoid the hors d?oeuvres table, then you should. Most networking events are short ? between 1 to 2 hours. Any time spent at the buffet is going to be a wasted opportunity.? You are literally leaving money on the table.? Think of it this way: those cheese and crackers are not really ?free? ? they are actually costing you money in terms of lost business and opportunities.

7. Look People in the Eye and Shake Hands

Studies have shown that people who look others in the eye are naturally perceived as being more powerful, warm, personable, and attractive. I am always perplexed when I meet someone and their eye contact is fleeting or distracted. By contrast, when I meet someone who makes solid eye contact, I immediately have a feeling that this person is warm and engaging.

On a related note, it is also important to have a firm and strong handshake. When you are meeting people, extend your hand and grip like you mean it. No ?limp fish? here, people.

8. Set a Goal for the Event

When I worked in politics earlier in my career, I worked for a number of politicians who would attack networking mixers with the ferocity of a pitbull. Although politicians get a bad rap most of the time (often deserved), there is a reason why they do this ? because it is effective.

If I told you that you could make more money in your career by really embracing networking events, would you take these events more seriously? I?m betting the answer is yes.

I find that the best way to teach yourself how to network at an event effectively is to set a solid goal for each event. Your goal could be the number of people you speak to, or number of business cards collected, or number of follow up appointments scheduled. Whatever your goal is, just make sure you set a goal and follow through with it.

Go Home Happy

After a face-to-face networking event, you should walk away with a bit of a skip in your step from the people you met and relationships you?ve already started to develop. If you go away from a networking event and don?t feel excited about it, then maybe you are going to the wrong kinds of networking events or haven?t set clear goals for your career or business.

The bottom line is you should find a networking event, get out there, and meet some people.

I?m sure you have some other ideas about how to network at an event.? What tips do you have? Please share them with everyone else below!

Photo credit: takomabibelot/Flickr

?

John Corcoran

John Corcoran has worked in Hollywood, written speeches for President Bill Clinton and lost his job when Arnold Schwarzenegger became the Governator. Even though he's lived in California most of his life, he is the world's worst surfer, although he does speak Valley Girl fluently. His day job is working with small business owners and entrepreneurs as a lawyer and business advisor.

More Posts - Website - Twitter - Facebook

Get My Free Ebook "10 Ways to Use Political Strategies and Tactics to Grow Your Business"

No Spam. We Promise.

Source: http://smartbusinessrevolution.com/how-to-network-at-an-event/

nfl nfl wes welker